Should-Have-Should-Of | Commonly Confused Words
Learn languages with fun

Master confusing words with ease

Should have vs. Should of

Should have

/ʃʊd həv/
A phrase indicating that something was ideal or advisable in the past, but did not happen.

Examples:

By now, we should have received the package.You should have asked her before making changes.They should have known the rules by now.

Synonyms:

This word has no synonyms

Antonyms:

This word has no antonyms

Should of

/ʃʊd əv/
This is a common mistaken contraction in place of 'should have'.

Examples:

He says he should of called you sooner.You should of seen the surprise on her face.I should of known better than to trust him.

Synonyms:

Antonyms:

This word has no antonyms

Ways to tell them apart:

etymology
  • Should have is the correct form; it includes the auxiliary verb have.
  • Remember have follows modal verbs like should, could, and would.
  • Think of should have as shouldve where have is contracted as ve, leading to confusion sometimes, but should always be should have'.
  • Should of arises from mishearing or misinterpreting the contraction shouldve'.
  • If youre expressing a condition or necessity referring to the past, always go with should have'.
© 2025 Lithium Lab Pte Ltd