Should have-Should of | Commonly Confused Words
Special Offer Special Offer
0d : 00h : 00m : 00s

Master confusing words with ease

Should have vs. Should of

Should have

/ʃʊd həv/
A phrase indicating that something was ideal or advisable in the past, but did not happen.

Examples:

By now, we should have received the package.You should have asked her before making changes.They should have known the rules by now.

Synonyms:

This word has no synonyms

Antonyms:

This word has no antonyms

Should of

/ʃʊd əv/
This is a common mistaken contraction in place of 'should have'.

Examples:

He says he should of called you sooner.You should of seen the surprise on her face.I should of known better than to trust him.

Synonyms:

Antonyms:

This word has no antonyms

Ways to tell them apart:

etymology
  • Should have is grammatically correct and should be used when describing something that was supposed to happen in the past.
  • Should of is a common error often made because of the phonetic similarity to shouldve, the contraction of should have'.
  • Remember: shouldve is a contraction for should have—theres no place for should of.
  • Always use should have or its contraction shouldve' for correctness.
  • A way to remember is that of is a preposition, while have helps to form the perfect aspect in verbs.
© 2025 Lithium Lab Pte Ltd